AbdulRehman Foundation

In the United States, the principles or bases of jurisdiction refer to the legal authority that allows a court to hear and decide a case. There are several different bases of jurisdiction recognized in the U.S. court system. I’ll provide a brief overview of the main principles of jurisdiction and explain how they relate to U.S. courts.

1. Personal Jurisdiction: Personal jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority over the parties involved in a case. A court must have personal jurisdiction over a defendant to render a valid judgment against them. Personal jurisdiction can be established in various ways, including:
   a. Presence: If a defendant is physically present within the court’s geographic jurisdiction, the court generally has personal jurisdiction over them.
   b. Domicile: A court can assert personal jurisdiction over a defendant who is a resident of, or has a permanent home in, the court’s jurisdiction.
   c. Consent: Parties can consent to a court’s jurisdiction by voluntarily submitting to the court’s authority.
2. Subject Matter Jurisdiction: Subject matter jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority to hear cases of a particular type or involving specific subject matters. In the United States, the federal court system has limited subject matter jurisdiction and can hear cases involving federal law, constitutional issues, and disputes between states. State courts, on the other hand, generally have broad subject matter jurisdiction and can hear a wide range of cases, including those involving state law and non-federal matters.
3. Territorial Jurisdiction: Territorial jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority over cases arising within a specific geographic area. Each state has its own court system with jurisdiction over matters that occur within its boundaries. Federal courts have jurisdiction over cases involving federal law or interstate disputes.
4. Appellate Jurisdiction: Appellate jurisdiction refers to a court’s authority to review decisions made by lower courts. In the United States, there is a hierarchical system of courts, with higher-level courts having appellate jurisdiction over lower-level courts. The U.S. Supreme Court, for example, has the highest appellate jurisdiction and can review decisions from both state and federal courts.

It’s important to note that the U.S. court system is complex, with federal and state courts operating concurrently and applying different jurisdictional principles based on their authority. The specific rules and procedures regarding jurisdiction can vary depending on the court and the type of case involved.

Tags: basic human rights, child rights, children's rights, civil rights, disability rights, freedom of assembly, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, human dignity, human rights abuses, human rights advocacy, human rights definition, human rights education, human rights issues, human rights law, human rights violation, human rights violations, indigenous peoples' rights, indigenous rights, international human rights, international human rights law, minority rights, Principles or Bases of Jurisdiction and U.S. Courts, refugee rights, reproductive rights, right, right to education, right to privacy, right to work, universal human rights, women's rights