Distinction in Non-international Armed Conflict
In the context of international humanitarian law (IHL), commonly known as the laws of war, a distinction is made between international armed conflicts (IACs) and non-international armed conflicts (NIACs). The distinction between these two types of conflicts is significant because different legal rules and protections apply to each.
International armed conflicts occur between two or more states, while non-international armed conflicts take place within the territory of a single state. The distinction is based on the nature of the conflict rather than the number of states involved.
In a non-international armed conflict, which includes civil wars, internal strife, or other types of armed confrontations within a state, the parties to the conflict are typically the government forces and one or more organized armed groups or rebel forces. IHL recognizes that even though the conflict is internal, certain fundamental rules and principles still apply to minimize human suffering and protect individuals not or no longer participating in the hostilities.
Here are some key distinctions in non-international armed conflicts:
- Applicable Legal Framework: The legal framework governing non-international armed conflicts primarily consists of common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and Additional Protocol II of 1977. These provisions set out the minimum standards of protection for all individuals involved in the conflict, including combatants and civilians. States are also expected to apply these rules through their domestic legislation.
- Parties to the Conflict: In non-international armed conflicts, the parties involved are the government forces and organized armed groups. This can include rebel groups, opposition forces, or other non-state actors engaged in armed hostilities against the government. The rules of IHL apply to all parties involved, regardless of their status or recognition.
- Scope of Application: IHL provisions in non-international armed conflicts apply not only to the conduct of hostilities but also to the protection of individuals who are not or no longer participating in the fighting. This includes civilians, wounded or sick combatants, and captured fighters. The principle of distinction requires that parties to the conflict distinguish between combatants and civilians, and only target the former while taking all feasible precautions to minimize harm to the latter.
- Human Rights Law: In non-international armed conflicts, human rights law continues to apply alongside IHL. While IHL focuses on regulating the conduct of hostilities, human rights law protects individuals’ broader rights and freedoms, such as the right to life, liberty, and a fair trial. States involved in non-international armed conflicts are obligated to respect and ensure human rights, even during times of armed conflict.
It’s important to note that the distinction between international and non-international armed conflicts helps determine the specific legal rules and obligations applicable to each situation. These rules aim to provide humanitarian protections to all individuals affected by armed conflicts, regardless of their nationality or the nature of the conflict.
Tags: basic human rights, child rights, children's rights, civil rights, disability rights, Distinction in Non-international Armed Conflict, freedom of assembly, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, human dignity, human rights abuses, human rights advocacy, human rights definition, human rights education, human rights issues, human rights law, human rights violation, indigenous peoples' rights, indigenous rights, international human rights, international human rights law, minority rights, refugee rights, reproductive rights, right, right to education, right to privacy, right to work, righthuman rights violations, universal human rights, women's rights