Appellate Court may take further evidence or direct it to be taken :


In legal systems, an appellate court generally has the power to review decisions made by lower courts. The scope of review in appellate courts is typically limited to reviewing the record of the proceedings from the lower court, including the evidence that was presented and the arguments made by the parties.

However, in certain circumstances, an appellate court may have the authority to take further evidence or direct that additional evidence be taken. This power is usually exercised when the appellate court determines that there is a need for additional evidence to properly address the issues on appeal.

The decision to take further evidence or order its collection is discretionary and depends on the rules and procedures of the specific jurisdiction. Appellate courts may consider factors such as the significance of the evidence, the impact it may have on the case, and whether it is necessary to ensure a fair and just resolution of the appeal.

It’s important to note that the rules governing the taking of further evidence in appellate courts can vary across different jurisdictions. Some legal systems may have specific provisions allowing for the introduction of new evidence in certain circumstances, while others may have more limited powers in this regard.

If you have a specific jurisdiction or case in mind, it would be helpful to provide more details so that I can provide a more precise answer based on the relevant laws and rules applicable in that jurisdiction.

Tags: ,

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *